Addison Duling

End Citizens United Committed To Ending Campaign Finance Abuses

A 2010 ruling by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Citizens United V. Federal Election Committee shocked many people involved with the current political system in America. Many feel that the true impact of this decision has not yet been fully realized. Many individuals and groups, including the political action committee “End Citizens United, have banded together in opposition to the ruling.

Many of these groups, End Citizens United Included, feel that the Citizens United court case will be one, that like the Dred Scott decision in 1857, or the Brown V. Board of Education ruling in 1954, will impact life in American society for decades to come. Unfortunately, these groups feel the impact will be for the worse.

The case centers on the conservative group, Citizens United, desire to show a film that was an hour and a half long attacking then presidential candidate Hillary Clinton in 2008.

The Federal Election Committee determined that the film amounted to an extremely long campaign advertisement. Citizens United were staunch in their refusal to provide any information regarding the cost of making the film or the individuals or groups that contributed to this cost. This was despite the fact that federal law at the time required them to provide this information regarding political advertisement.

Citizens United filed a suit in federal court to have the ruling by the FEC overturned but the attempt was unsuccessful. Two years later, long after the Democratic Primary and the presidential election was concluded, the United States Supreme Court overturned the earlier ruling by the federal court and brought to an end nearly 100 years worth of case law involving the financing of political campaigns.

The 5-4 Supreme Court ruling majority established the opinion that freedom of speech protections allowed to citizens of the United States under the Constitution was to be extended to corporations in the country. End Citizens United points out that this decision was made despite the fact that the modern American corporation did not exist when the U.S. Constitution was penned and shocked many close to the case.

Those standing against the decision feel the Supreme Court dissolved any jurisdiction the court systems in the country had at preventing corporations to decide the outcome of political elections by using money and influence.

This is especially problematic in the opinion of End Citizens United and many other detractors of the decision who point out that many corporations doing business in the United States are multi-national entities and can use this gateway to advance causes of foreign interests.

Learn More:

A Review Of George Soros’s Philanthropic Activities And Conspiracy Theories Against Him

Freedom of speech, transparency, and accountable governance remain the key challenges facing many societies across the globe. Moreover, a limited number of people enjoy equality and social justice. George Soros is working towards changing this phenomenon. The hedge fund billionaire is changing this situation by funding organizations that fights for these issues across the globe. He took it upon himself to found Open society Foundations to enhance his efforts. In his career, Soros has donated over $12 billion in support of various initiatives. This staggering amount makes him one of the world’s foremost philanthropists. George is also the founder and chair of Soros Fund Management. Soros has contributed money towards the fight for people facing discrimination. He has focused much towards Europe’s Roma people, sex workers, LGBTI people, and drug users. His efforts have seen many nations across the globe adopt policies that protect the rights of these people. Soros’ work has seen the Roma People enjoy inclusion in government policies across Europe. These countries have also taken steps to ensure they are not discriminated against. This information was originally reported on Open Society Foundation and learn more about George Soros.

Irrespective of Soros philanthropic efforts, he has been the target of many outrageous conspiracy theories. These accusations have mainly originated from the right. The conservatives view Soros efforts as his attempt to control global wealth. They are also accusing him for pushing for a global order. However, all these claims are wrong given that there is no evidence to support them. Conspiracy theories against Soros started in the early 90s. This was a few years after he successfully bet against the British pound. The bet gave him a profit of over one billion dollars. A few years after this success, he made a similar bet during the Asian Financial Crisis. Following his success, the right accused him of capitalizing on catastrophes. The then Malaysian prime minister accused George of making the country’s currency to lose over 15 percent of its value. However, these claims were unfounded and what George Soros knows.

According to Joe Uscinski, the accusations against Soros are unique. Similar accusations have always been made by the left against the right. However, with Soros case, the situation is different. Uscinki is a professor of political science at the University of Miami. Attention on the billionaire’s statement rose even further when he campaigned against George W. Bush’s war in Iraq. The rights activist maintained that the war was not based on facts and it would lead to the violation of the rights of many Iraqis. Soros’ determination to see the end of the war saw him fund campaigns aimed at blocking the President’s re-election bid. In their response, the right accused him of trying to manipulate global politics with nefarious intent. George continues to be a target of unsubstantiated right-wing conspiracy theories. This information was originally mentioned on Business Insider.

More Visit: