Addison Duling

End Citizens United Files Complaint Against Rick Scott

Recently the political action committee End Citizens United has filed a complaint against Rick Scott. They filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission. The complaint filed with the Federal Election Commission claims that Rick Scott is raising illegal funds for his senatorial campaign.

End Citizens United is a political action group that aims to end corporate dollars in senatorial and House of Representatives campaigns. End Citizens United is claiming that Rick Scott could not have raised as much money as he did, which is in the 78 million-dollar range, unless there was corporate funding in his campaign.

Rick Scott denies End Citizens United claims that he is using corporate funds to pay for his senatorial campaign. ECU is stating that Rick Scott is more interested in his political ambitions than he is in the law. They state that Rick Scott should not be able to use the 78 million dollars that he has raised because he raised it illegally with corporate funds.

End citizens united will continue to support Democratic candidates who do not use corporate money for their campaigns. They will support Democratic candidates who support their mission to keep corporate money out of political campaigns. ECU is a political action group that does not support political campaigns that are supported by corporate funds.

In supporting Democratic candidates who support the ECU cause, ECU hopes to change the Constitution and amend it so that it reflects their causes. End Citizens is not oblivious to the idea that it is going to take a long time. They are willing to fight for the long time that it takes to get corporate money out of political campaigns.

End Citizens will continue to support Democratic candidates who pledge to keep corporate spending out of political campaigns. End Citizens most recent filing of a complaint against Rick Scott is showing how justifiable they are in their cause. Their cause is to end a campaign called citizens united.

End citizens will go the extra mile to fight for their cause. They will continue to support Democratic campaigns with those who support the End Citizens ideology.

End Citizens United’s Facebook Page:

End Citizens United Committed To Ending Campaign Finance Abuses

A 2010 ruling by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Citizens United V. Federal Election Committee shocked many people involved with the current political system in America. Many feel that the true impact of this decision has not yet been fully realized. Many individuals and groups, including the political action committee “End Citizens United, have banded together in opposition to the ruling.

Many of these groups, End Citizens United Included, feel that the Citizens United court case will be one, that like the Dred Scott decision in 1857, or the Brown V. Board of Education ruling in 1954, will impact life in American society for decades to come. Unfortunately, these groups feel the impact will be for the worse.

The case centers on the conservative group, Citizens United, desire to show a film that was an hour and a half long attacking then presidential candidate Hillary Clinton in 2008.

The Federal Election Committee determined that the film amounted to an extremely long campaign advertisement. Citizens United were staunch in their refusal to provide any information regarding the cost of making the film or the individuals or groups that contributed to this cost. This was despite the fact that federal law at the time required them to provide this information regarding political advertisement.

Citizens United filed a suit in federal court to have the ruling by the FEC overturned but the attempt was unsuccessful. Two years later, long after the Democratic Primary and the presidential election was concluded, the United States Supreme Court overturned the earlier ruling by the federal court and brought to an end nearly 100 years worth of case law involving the financing of political campaigns.

The 5-4 Supreme Court ruling majority established the opinion that freedom of speech protections allowed to citizens of the United States under the Constitution was to be extended to corporations in the country. End Citizens United points out that this decision was made despite the fact that the modern American corporation did not exist when the U.S. Constitution was penned and shocked many close to the case.

Those standing against the decision feel the Supreme Court dissolved any jurisdiction the court systems in the country had at preventing corporations to decide the outcome of political elections by using money and influence.

This is especially problematic in the opinion of End Citizens United and many other detractors of the decision who point out that many corporations doing business in the United States are multi-national entities and can use this gateway to advance causes of foreign interests.

Learn More:

How End Citizens United is Changing Politics

We are rapidly seeing the political world change before our eyes. The 2016 Presidential Election and corresponding inauguration of President Trump has changed the game forever. As a result, more and more people are needing to step up and become politically active in terms of standing up for what they believe in. That is where End Citizens United has come into play. End Citizens United is a political action committee that was formed roughly six months ago in order to combat the rising problems of dark money in politics. Dark money is cash that floats around, underneath the surface of scrutiny, corrupting politicians into following an agenda.


End Citizens United gets their name from the infamous Supreme Court case held back in 2010. In 2010 a conservative corporation by the name of Citizens United argued before the Supreme Court for looser political donation regulations. Their goal, in essence, was to loosen the noose around political campaign financing in order to essentially purchase their politicians. In some otherworldly way they managed to win at the Supreme Court, thus changing the political landscape forever. In reaction many groups formed together to fight the decision but no group has gained as much traction as End Citizens United. End Citizens United is a focused PAC that is raising money in order to help finance politicians who will put an end to dark money in politics.


The first three months of 2017 saw incredible donations being sent into End Citizens United. People were fueled by their dislike and admonishment of Donald Trump being elected. Through the first quarter of the 2017 fiscal year the PAC would earn an eye popping $4 million. While this number is hefty it is far from where they want to be by the end of the year. In fact, End Citizens United is aiming to raise over $35 million by the time that it is all said and done. End Citizens United is gaining ground and gaining steam with more than 100,000 people giving money to the cause while an additional 40,000 gave personal time to invest into the job.


What makes End Citizens United so special is that they are as focused as they are home grown. This isn’t a PAC that is funded by the mega wealthy in an attempt to manipulate elections and take power away from the people. The average donation size in 2017 has been just $12. The donors here are just people who want more control of the political discourse in the United States of America. Tiffany Muller, President of End Citizens United, says that people “feel like the system is rigged against them” and she goes on to say that “THis is their way of fighting back.”


End Citizens United; Fighting Unlimited and Undisclosed Elections Funding

End Citizens United (ECU) refers to a Political Action Agency that is financed by grassroots donors and is committed to opposing the catastrophic effects of Citizen United as well as revolutionizing the US campaign finance system. ECU wax founded in 2015 after the 2010 Supreme Court’s decision that altered the American Elections by permitting unlimited and undisclosed elections spending.


On April 21, 2017, ECU endorsed Rob Quist for Congress since he was vying to represent Montana. Tiffany Muller, an Executive Director at ECU, reported that Quist was the best candidate to represent Montana in Congress since he was a grassroots champion who opposed the special interests and billionaires who were buying elections for their selfish gains. Rob was a man of the people who fought people’s rights in matters of access to public lands and ensuring transparent elections. Meanwhile, millionaire challenger had petitioned to sell off public lands and undermined Montana’s good governance and campaign finance laws since he was receiving money from some secretive special interest groups. For this reason, ECU is proud to support Rob and not his opponent.


In a statement, Rob Quist illuminated that many of the politicians supported the interests of the few individuals that financed their election campaign instead of working for the people they are supposed to represent. He was, therefore, pleased to collaborate with ECU who had supported hardworking individuals and countered the organisations that bought elections. ECU has thousands of supporters in Montana, and it will work with them to ensure that Quist has all the resources to win.


Article 2

Taking Charge of Financial Collections


End Citizens United has managed to raise its money. Currently, it has collected over $ 4 million from January 2017 to March 2017. The committee plans to raise approximately $35 million before the 2018 midterm elections for Congress. This will be deemed a milestone since the $25 million the Political Action Committee (PAC) took in during the 2016 election, the committee’s first election cycle in operation.


Tiffany Muller revealed that over 100,000 individuals contributed to the PAC in its first quarter with over 40,000 people being first-time donors. According to Muller, most of the donors are individuals who feel that system is rigged against them with donors having the biggest say. As a result, they fight back by supporting campaign-finance reform champions. Recently, PAC has urged its supporters to contribute $ 500,000 to support Jon Ossoff, a first-time political candidate in Georgia. Jon stunned the agency after he raised approximately $ 4 million for the April 18 special election.


ECU functions as a conventional PAC and allows a maximum contribution of $ 5,000 from a single donor. Regardless of that donation cap, it’s fundraising in 2016 topped the Democratic-aligned group’s expenditure in the recent elections.


The Career of Andrea McWilliams

With all of the changes that are going on in politics, it is important to get back to the basics if you are going to run a political campaign. A lot of people struggle when it comes to raising money. With all of the changes that are starting to take place, now is a great time to start investing in this area. There are a lot of people who need help with the organization and structure of their campaign when starting out. Many political candidates are interested in politics because they believe they can make a positive change in the lives of other people. However, they come to find out that things are much more difficult than they ever realized. On top of that, you need to have a plan for your future that involves long term success and planning. A lot of people struggle with this issue, especially as it relates to their future.

Political Changes

Andrea McWilliams is from the Dallas area. In her time in politics, she has done a great job of helping people organize and fund things that they are passionate about. Not only that, but she is excited about all of the changes that are starting to come to fruition. If you want to work with someone who has a passion for helping others, she is the person to go to. Not only does she want to invest in the lives of others, but she understands the most effective ways to have a positive impact on others as well. Overall, she is a great example of the impact that others can make on a life and career. Andrea McWilliams has won a variety of awards for her work in the field. Although she does not hold office, she is a great person to go to if you need political help.